HTC TyTN II camera performance

Search & Download Videos:



Loading... IMPORTANT :: YOU MUST SAVE THE FILE AS ".FLV"
Change the file name from "get_video" to "video.flv"


Here's a show of the camera in the TyTN II. For the first couple of seconds I'm "aiming" towards a brightly lit area. As you can see the fps is at ~20 which is kind of OK. (Though it still suffers from ghosting or slow response time). The problem is evident after a few seconds when I "aim" at a dark area. As you can see the fps drops to 2-3 fps. Also at the end I show you how long it takes from the point where you click the "take photo" button down fully (when the white square first appears) to the point where the picture is taken (same time as a picture is actually displayed in the video). This renders the camera functionality pretty much useless unless you are in a extremely well lit room.

Tags:

Comments to “HTC TyTN II camera performance”

  1. Derrik Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 02:01:14 pew pew pew. my msn messenger id is in my profile! msg me if u want! i
  2. HEBE Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 02:24:13 Starting in 2010, all digital video cameras including cameraphones and webcams which can't spew out a minimum of 320x240 with minimal blockiness and >15fps should be all destroyed or placed in landfill, either by the manufacturers or the users themselves. What is the point of 'high resolution' blurry, grainy photos and 'video' recordings that record at 2 frames per second and sound like they were recorded underwater? This isn't directed to the OP of course, but to the manufacturers out there.
  3. Sherif Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 02:47:12 How can I zoom with this camera?
  4. Rawls Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 03:10:11 It is a pretty atrocious camera. It's outperformed by my old HTC Wizard or even my ancient Samsung SGH-E720. Anything below full daylight and the screen just displays a slow, blurry mess unless you can stay stock still; so that's decent photos and videos out the window. Not what you'd expect on such an expensive phone. It seems like unless it has enough light it just completely demolishes the camera shutter speed to compensate for poor sensitivity.
  5. Lilah Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 03:33:10 the fix works btw, justto sleep mode for 2-3 seconds and then wake it up and the camera is fine. put the phone in
  6. MASKINI Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 03:56:09 Not sure if the response has been posted but the zoom is on the sreen on the camera, left side center.
  7. Evangeline Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 04:19:08 The iphone don't have a zoom either...
  8. Zoe Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 04:42:07 The viewer has an acceptable framerate but the pictures are WAY too dark.
  9. ANDSWARE Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 05:05:06 Yea, the camera needs some help, how long can you possibly expect someone or something to hold still for that really long response time of taking the picture to actually happen. Also where's the damn ZOOM. First damn camera phone I've seen with no zoom. WTF?
  10. Constance Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 05:28:05 there is a trick to fix the lag. turn on the camera. push the power button. wait like 5-10 secs than hit the power button again. the camera should work fine
  11. Mirabelle Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 05:51:04 It's black because you vcannot capture the image output from a PC it's 2-3 fps when the seeker is aimed at a dim envoirment, it goes up to 18 when I point it towards a lamp (or you could just have read the video description and you'd know all that)
  12. Onyebuchi Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 06:14:03 that's not dim that's called black, plus it's doing 18FPS. what are you expecting out of it?
  13. Traci Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 06:37:02 I find the camera usable. Very usable. More than the camera on my Samsung 500, or Motorola Razor. As I recall, I can't seem to get the business card scan and recognition software working on my Motorola RAZOR.
  14. Onyebuchi Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 07:00:01 I didn't expect a perfect camera, I just expected it to be usable. It clearly isn't in dim conditions. No one is expecting it to be a great camera, but I think it's reasonable to expect it to perform on par with 99 USD phones.
  15. Mildred Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 07:23:00 I don't get it. I love this phone. Who would buy a $700 phone and not do the research. IMO it is the best all around PDA phone on the market. It is not a Camera, and is not a computer. It is a phone that, when asked, does camera work, and computer work better than any other phone I have ever seen.
  16. Cochava Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 07:45:59 I own the att tilt. Its one of the only downfall s on this phone.
  17. Wilona Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 08:08:58 yes that is a pity for the tytnii. I have it and the first thing I tought is that they could have done a better camera. But it is ok compared to all the other feautres. :)
  18. MAZEL Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 08:31:57 SHIT
  19. Atrayu Says:
    January 8th, 2009 at 08:54:56 For the first couple of seconds I'm "aiming" towards a brightly lit area. At this point the fps is at 18 which is "ok". The problem is evident after a few seconds when I "aim" at a dark area. As you can see the fps drops to 2-3 fps. Also at the end I show you how long it takes from the point where you click the "take photo" button down fully (when the white square first appears) to the point where the picture is taken (same time as a picture is actually displayed in the video).

Leave a Reply


Comments (0)

Bookmarks


                

Ads

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

eXTReMe Tracker